Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: BFGMiner 3.10.0: modular ASIC+FPGA, GBT+Strtm, RPC, Mac/Lnx/W64, AntU1, DRB, HFA
by
Cassey
on 07/02/2014, 18:47:37 UTC
Pulled a new clone this evening and now seeing:

[2014-02-07 02:36:31] AMU: Applying rule antminer:clock=x0981: Unknown option: clock

... when bfgminer launches.

Suggestions?
This is during probe, before the "clock" option exists.
It should still be set successfully when initialising the device.
I'll reduce the message to debug loglevel so as to avoid confusing people...

Thanks Luke, although I don't recall ever seeing it before last night.  Maybe just never noticed it...

Now I'm trying to figure out why my all time average and effective average has changed.  I was pretty much 2's across the board until last night, but there were lots of rebuilds on the system yesterday.

bfgminer version 3.10.0 - Started: [2014-02-07 10:15:53] - [  0 days 02:24:
 [M]anage devices [P]ool management [ S]ettings [D]isplay options [H]elp [Q]u
 Connected to us-east.multipool.us diff 64 with stratum as user Cassey.miner
 Block: ...b3a79105 #752072  Diff:7.65k (54.79Gh/s)  Started: [12:40:22]
 ST:8  F:3  NB:43  AS:0  BW:[871/ 10 B/s]  E:2.80  I: 3.54 BTC/hr  BS:9.36k
 6            | 12.73/ 6.46/ 5.37Gh/s | A:319 R:45+6( 14%) HW:8/.06%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 AMU 0:       |  2.06/ 1.08/ 0.91Gh/s | A: 50 R: 7+0( 12%) HW:2/.10%
 AMU 1:       |  2.06/ 1.08/ 0.83Gh/s | A: 60 R:11+5( 21%) HW:2/.10%
 AMU 2:       |  2.05/ 1.08/ 0.96Gh/s | A: 59 R: 6+0(9.2%) HW:1/.05%
 AMU 3:       |  2.05/ 1.08/ 0.91Gh/s | A: 54 R: 7+0( 11%) HW:1/.05%
 AMU 4:       |  2.06/ 1.08/ 0.93Gh/s | A: 53 R: 4+1(8.7%) HW:2/.10%
 AMU 5:       |  2.05/ 1.08/ 0.86Gh/s | A: 44 R:10+0( 18%) HW:0/none
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [2014-02-07 12:40:18] Accepted 0347e94d AMU 0  pool 0 Diff 78/64
 [2014-02-07 12:40:22] Network difficulty changed to 7.65k (54.79Gh/s)
 [2014-02-07 12:40:22] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block

Maybe its just a reporting change? When I look at the pool stats I see:

Active Workers
      Hashrate
Coin   Worker Name   1 minute   10 minute
btc   Cassey.miner2am   13744   12599

Which is a bit higher than the 12Gh/s I expected, but in line with the 20-second decaying rates reported above.