I countered the negative that iCEBREAKER left for nutildah as it seems to be nothing more than arguments and a difference of opinions. I don't know nutildah any more than them being a participant in my campaign but when I read up on it I figured that was the best way to go. I also asked nutildah to remove the negative feedback they had left for iCEBREAKER since at that point it only becomes a back and forth where everyone will lose.
No that is not true.
There is not just a difference of opinion.
The project is a PROVEN scam. Or has origins tied to a scam. There is no room for opinion.
If nutildah has been constantly defending or excusing this then ...............well......
So you are making a precedent here for your trust which I am noting down.
Those supporting proven scams and defending them are not eligible for RED TRUST and you will counter that.
Thanks I will archive this now for future use.
Also you feel just arguments and differences of opinion (which this is not) are also not grounds for red trust and they too you will counter.
That's a good post and I hope that you really meant it.