Re: Are these enough proofs to tag this HIGH RANK ring? Need DT opinions

Adding even more alts same btc address in the same "Let's Think About the Future Signature Campaign (All Ranks Welcome)" signature https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1560376.0 Roll Eyes

Account: Casanova18

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1560376.msg18943827#msg18943827

Quote

Name: Casanova18
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=959495
Post count: 73
Rank: Member
Bitcoin address: 34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89

http://archive.fo/1S6sH

Quote from: Lampaster on July 19, 2018, 10:06:18 AM

Bitcointalk Username: Lampaster
Rank: SR Member
Current post count: 612
BTC Address: 34iUxR4azr93p9gnpetSKS6hPTuWbSpN89
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar : Yes

http://archive.fo/tzwVc#selection-7913.13-7906.7

Account: ValeryBark

Quote from: Proton2233 on July 19, 2018, 09:59:27 AM

Bitcointalk Username: Proton2233
Rank: SR Member
Current post count: 815
BTC Address: 3HDWQDS82Hnz7oCQBKRzuutiDqmZoXrp6c
Wear appropriate signature : Yes
Wear avatar: Yes

http://archive.fo/SacjR#selection-8279.13-8272.7

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1560376.msg18930188#msg18930188

Quote

Name: ValeryBark
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=959184
Post count: 89
Rank: Member
Bitcoin address: 3HDWQDS82Hnz7oCQBKRzuutiDqmZoXrp6c
[/url]
http://archive.fo/a42O7

Account: Barmen

Quote from: sindikat on July 19, 2018, 10:47:18 AM

Btctalk name: Coffee135
Rank: Full member
Current post count:665
BTC address: 3CP6yJ3ARGi3g7daiPmBnPGCHVZG1v3sVX
Wear appropriate signature: yes
Wear avatar: yes

Note: he "casually" posted as coffee135
http://archive.fo/gvW4i#selection-4189.13-4182.7

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1560376.msg18823923#msg18823923

Quote

Your Username: Barmen
Position to Apply: Jr. Member
Your Current Post Count: 38
Your BTC Address: 3CP6yJ3ARGi3g7daiPmBnPGCHVZG1v3sVX

http://archive.fo/RzcGi

@suchmoon I just saw your answer here
Do you still think this is casual?
I know we have no final proof BUT this cannot be casual IMHO
I've found a lot more than Hexah did in the past.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4883870.msg44154143#msg44154143

Quote from: suchmoon on August 16, 2018, 01:22:54 AM

Quote from: Hexah on August 15, 2018, 10:41:26 PM

Okay it was, but on the way it was sent and have same time logs

This is a shared wallet. Multiple users deposit to their assigned addresses then some process probably sweeps it to another address. So it's very likely for the timestamps to match but that doesn't prove anything.

Quote from: Hexah on August 15, 2018, 10:41:26 PM

, the way they have synonymous date registry although other 2 haven't, the way that these users are cycling out there merits and the way that Palmerson merited Lieldoryn post on 12th of August because of the merit requirements in the BQT campaign. Right now those account has been waked up from long sleep on July 19 maybe this post has been seen.

Sending or receiving merits doesn't prove anything.

Yes this is a multiply shared wallet and casually is used on the signatures application thread bounties only from these users on the same day, not a day before or after only the day when 1 of them apply for a signature (more than 75% only on yahoo's signatures) they all apply.

Sending merit is not a proof, but over 90% of merit send only between them is not casual.