..
I'm not objecting but is it better if we have an hashpower criteria, e.g. if the pool hash reach 20g, then it's ok for the 24 shares bounty. So not every pool who has deploy the same code can apply this bounty.
The reason for the bounty is to see if Sidhujag's Daemon makes devcoin blocks that the old clients accept. We just need a single block for that. If it does, then we can make Sidhujag's the official client and archive the old one.
Edit: Even though we only need a single block, I'll make it a standard bounty with half (12) for the block found by a second pool, so that more pools have incentive to try Sidhujag's code.