Question to a person creating topic: you checked their whitepaper, but haven't checked the socials to see that they have the some members working in both platforms? Great work, dude 
As Secrets of Zurich told in their telegram "Secrets of Zurich is the side development project of Bitcoinus team with another development orientation on individuals" - what is also obvious if to check LinkedIn and see that one of Bitcoinus developers officially wrote that he is working in Secrets of Zurich project.
So yeah, their whitepaper is definitely fail, but before telling about scam don't you think you should check much longer than 1 minute on website?
As Secrets of Zurich told in their telegram "Secrets of Zurich is the side development project of Bitcoinus team with another development orientation on individuals" - what is also obvious if to check LinkedIn and see that one of Bitcoinus developers officially wrote that he is working in Secrets of Zurich project.
So yeah, their whitepaper is definitely fail, but before telling about scam don't you think you should check much longer than 1 minute on website?
First - Where is the team on https://www.soz.fund ? There is NO team listed on your website.
How long do you think it took us checking your whitepaper? We can guarantee you that was more than 1 minute.
Maybe you should spend at least 30 seconds looking for a link to the "team members"
If you want transparency, show it/make it, don't expect investors to go to social media asking questions about a team that doesn't exist on the website. ANd there is nothing about Bitcoinus on SOZ.fund website either. You only have a plagiarized whitepaper there, and that is more than enough to make investors walk away. Now you will live with the consequences.