It is insane that people think just 2000 bets would somehow "show the real odds in fortunejack" while not realizing there is a luck chance involved in shorter amount of bets so you would need to play thousands of hands to make it possible to determine the reality, maybe even a million.
You can't just gamble 2 thousand times and expect that everything will be exactly the same, there are tough luck times and there are lucky times, its all about the timing, if you want the house edge to get into affect you would have to look at so much more bets that in the end you should be tired even if its autobet. Companies with high cpu power do auto betting for hundreds of millions of times in order to determine if a casino is legit or not for white hack security purposes, your 2 thousand is funny compared to that.
The man said FJ would NOT give him his complete history but only 2000. So based on the 2000 he was able to obtain its shows that the game is indeed rigged.
I'm just the man you mentioned. FJ refused to give me my complete history without any reason. I had 181 thousand rolls in fact. the lastest are just the sample of the 181 thousand rolls. What's more, similar things happened through out the 181k rolls, which included the 2000 ones of course, that the chance for a losing streak happening when you keep doubling the bets to a rather high value. But long losing streaks seldom happen on bets being kept low. So dont' say my conclusion is based on 2000 rolls! It's a fact throught out 181k rolls!