I'm sorry you believe that in anyway answers the question I posed or the situation here. This is why imbeciles must not be merit sources nor DT. They simply do not have the capacity to differentiate between a net positive and net negative post.

How does this in anyway apply to account sellers that are termed "high risk" for scamming? do they all scam?
How does this in anyway apply to people who mistake "scare quotes" for actual quotes when they are mixed in amongst real quotes of what they have said? do they all scam
How does this in anyway relate to people presenting facts regarding wrong doing?

Also I have seen people red trusted for supporting projects that are still running but cast as "possible" scams?


You either wait for PROVEN scams or they demonstrate behaviour that suggests they are STRONGLY likely to scam. Of course there may be multiple signs of icos setting up scams so that would cross the threshold of STRONGLY likely to scam.

Your faux rebuttal only fools imbeciles of your level of intelligence or lower. Stick to debating with those types.

Your problem and most DT's problem is you have zero experience in the ALT section and little experience with the BIGGEST scams. Those setting up a quick exit with multiple signs of scamming are small fry amateurs that would only fool the dumbest and greediest risk takers. You are missing the REALLY damaging scams.

Keep in mind there is a chasm between NOT red trusting them and supporting or promoting.