Yes, I also find it very funny to see people like you, as they only take charge, to attack a project without first asking any questions.
As mentioned before the issue of the whitepaper was an error when uploading a whitepaper that the team had rejected (as well as others). Our web developer uploaded that file to the server by mistake. Simply that: a human error!
Here there is neither an old whitepaper nor a new whitepaper. The whitepaper is one only, version 1.0.
The idea was to make a simple whitepaper with the initial clear idea of ​​the project. A simple project, fork of Cryptonote. Without mysteries.
As a project, the idea is to evolve over time and our idea is that together with the project, we will add new technologies and new products.
In this way our whitepaper will evolve as well as our website.
Several famous projects have had constant changes, big mistakes, changes in the members of their teams, and that's why they would be considered SCAM?
With regard to the team, rest assured, at the end of March, a last developer will be added, there our team will be complete and our web developer will update our official website with all that information. It was what we considered correct with the whole team.
Now instead of attacking all the time, why do not you take the time to write a post with all the questions that come up?
We consider instead of having written this post, I should have been contacted to resolve any inconvenience.
It is very easy to attack without knowing all the hours that it takes to develop a project, and the great economic costs that this implies, costs that our team is assuming.
Have a nice day.