I think that it should matter WHO disagrees, not HOW MANY of them do. If these are some random weirdos that some some reason don't want changes, then to hell with them,
ok, but what method do you propose to us in order to determine who is a "weirdo" and who is not so that we can ignore those? what if those "weirdos" also found you a "weirdo" and considered what you support to not be the ay to go?
you see, that is the problem when you bring "who" in instead of "what and how many".