In my opinion, hardfork at 95% agreement without the power of exercising veto is the strongest network structure we can observe! Because this is how the majority will win for the greater good!
To clarify, the "6% veto" is something that naturally results from requiring 95% consensus to approve a change. You can't have a high activation threshold without effectively granting more power to those who might oppose change. Say if 94% of the network wanted to active a feature, but 6% wanted to block it, then the feature would not activate. Those who resist changes have an easier job.
Would that not stagnate technological progress and create constant deadlocks where improvements to the protocol could not be made? That's why I'm interested in hearing different views on that particular point.