Yes we saw that disclaimer "PSEUDONYMOUS" on their website, but it doesnt justify a reason to STEAL people's identity - which is a crime.
Here is the profile of one of the victims, you can see his real name, etc. He is not one of those stock photos that can be used without the owner's consent.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/stenehall/It really doesn't justify anything as far as the law is concerned what they did is inexcusable "pseudonymous" isn't even the right word to justify it. mean they faked the whole identity not only the name but also the picture of the members (if they really do have one). Being pseudonymous only means using a pretentious name and it doesn't mean you can use another person's picture to do so. What they did simply belongs under the lines of identity fraud.