I just wanted to see what you all said about it.
This is not just about one person anyway this is a general precedent that I wanted to establish first. If someone advertised an account for sale then months later a message saying it was no longer for say appeared then does that get them off the hook or not or do they still get flagged?
If a DT really wants to know who this sold legend account or even DT member is then just ask me to create rep thread and I will post the SALE thread url for them to witness.
When you view that particular thread, I think a respondent stated it all:
But it would be worth even less once someone tags the account as being sold.
You should of sold using a dummy account first to avoid this from happening.
It is clear that this individual didn't know what they were doing and likely made the account unsaleable.
I also checked the
archived secolgs between the initial post and the sale retraction post. There is no evidence of the password being changed in that time period.(I would think someone who acquired an account would at least do that, even if they got the e-mail and staked address. Why would someone leave the password the same after purchasing it, unless they want to get the account stolen back from them?) It appears that the case you are referring to is a no harm/no foul. I'm not going to tag it. Perhaps if it was a fresh posting, I may have decided to tag it.
Now to be clear that we are on the same page, the example being referred to happens to be
nutildah, correct? If you have another account in mind, I suppose that I can research that for you too.
