Sorry, I was trying to understand if where is the Analogy there?
Alice is on the bus and suddenly BOB (alice has never seen him before) turns up and grabs Alice's cell phone and claims he is keeping it and it is now his own personal cell phone. Alice then says to BOB give my phone back BOB or else I will go to the cops and report this theft.
Who is this theft? Doesn't make sense. If BOB is the theft, Alice should have said "I will report you to the police/cops". Or is this a riddle? Is she in wonderland?
well view it that she said that then if that helps
I will report YOU or I will report YOUR actions ie the theft does not really matter for this.
Welcome to wonderland.
@foxpup
Meanwhile Start a thread with all the stupid things I have said so that I can demonstrate they are all true and not stupid at all. Not here though make your own thread.
So you didn't have these problems earlier on foxpup. You just said that Alice was a blackmailer and therefore untrustworthy?
Why now all the speculation on the universal set of behaviours that cell phone thieves are bound to because you say so ? this is not at all important. Or are you now changing your tune? is alice now not a blackmailer and untrustworthy?
What happened -- happened. That is the analogy. You are not here to say it is unlikely to happen in that way. You are meant to stick to your original statement that Alice is a blackmailer and untrustworthy. Or are you now saying that is not what you would say if asked to comment this scenario? Analogies need not be what you would consider realistic they only need to mirror the principles of another scenario.
So you are changing your mind now or not? alice the blackmailer and bob the victim yes or no?