Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [SUGGESTION] Campaigns Should Be Self Moderated - Edited
by
tranthidung
on 23/03/2019, 08:20:21 UTC
Like those cases:

Joinable ranks:
Rates
Member - .0015 btc/week
Full Member - .003 btc/week
Sr Member - .005 btc/week
Hero - .0075 btc/week
Legendary - .010 btc/week

Latest announcements:
I have an open full member and sr member slot

Then, brand new and newbies came, spammed, and asked for joining.
Btctalk name: alejito
Link to profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=147960
Rank: Newbie
Current post count: 9
Windice username: YourLuckyHere
Wear appropriate signature: No
Wear avatar: No
hello

Or those cases:

manager announced the campaign was full
We are now full! The first week begins in ~14 hours. If you hav eany questions or concerns, feel free to send me a PM.
Then, one applicant below this post of manager
Bitcointalk Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942351
Current Post Count (Including this post): 726
Amount of EARNED Merit: 2
ERC-20 Eligible ETH Address: 0x0Cf1cacCcf67E8127919887a13CF7329EF24Fc2E


In short, self-modoration might be a necessary management in bounty topics.
To be honest, I have never been a bounty manager, so I am not sure the self moderation might lead to complaints from candidates, participants or not.


I think set some local rules are appropriate:
- Applications from brandnew, newbies or unjoinable ranks (depends on each campaign) will be deleted without announcement.
- Applications when no open slots announced will be deleted too (but I doubt that managers will spend their time to deleted such applications).