2 questions:
what's the point of on site VS off site
if you want to invest 3 BTC, why would you put 3 BTC in the on site VS 1 BTC in the on site and 2 BTC in the off site? you qre going to hqve the exact same earnings, with more risk, is there anything else different?
result of this: all the big/smart guys leverage max, if there is 1000 BTC in the on site, there is 2000 offsite and with the investment above you own .1%
if offsite didnt exist you would still own .1%. It complicates stuff but dont see any benefit. Except that the actual dilute fee becomes 6 instead of 2% (because everyone pretends to invest 3 times as much and pays 2% fee on 200% non-existing btc).
who is that 2 (or 6 however you see it) % fee going? distributed according to investors' onsite or total (on/off)site investment?
i like the site, but a lot of things are never mentioned clearly and that makes it kinda suspicious to me.
The off-site system is designed to reduce risk exposure by keeping funds in the cold wallet, but it can be abused for leverage. For example, if you have a large off-site investment, then your gains/losses are magnified, similar to margin trading. This means that you can also be liquidated in case a big whale comes on and wins a significant percentage of the bankroll. If the whale first wins big and then loses it all, even if the bankroll comes out ahead, if you have used the off-site system to leverage your investment, you will lose your money. However, the house is winning, your gains are multiplied. devans would probably recommend not to abuse the off-site system to leverage your investment, but I'd say that having a 2x or 3x leverage is pretty smart, since megawhale events are quite rare. It depends on your risk profile.