Out of all the posts they could merit why would they merit that one? Doesn't make any sense. At least make an attempt to hide the abuse. I guess this is one downside of requiring x amount of merit to be able to join a campaign. On the face of it it's a good thing, but not really if someone just accepts anyone as long as they have the x amount of merit. That's why campaign managers should be vetting their applicants. If that user received all their merit within the last day or two of applying and for shitposts then that should set alarm bells going. People's post history should still be looked at regardless of how much merit they've got.
Let me give u merit on the post with your proof of authorization
and we will give u red tag?
Do you eliminate competitors in such a vile way?
lol
If you read the thread you would see there's several pieces of evidence tying them together, thus proving the abuse in this case.