We are headed into massive deflation, and perhaps you fundamentally don't understand that hyperinflation only occurs in peripheral economics, not in the core of the global economy.

http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/01/28/here-we-go-again-hypreinflation/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/01/14/hyperinflation-is-it-even-possible/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/11/20/hyperinflation-all-just-hype/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2014/01/14/hyperinflation-impossibility-in-private-sector/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/08/11/defining-hyperinflation-the-coming-new-currency/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2012/07/04/hyperinflation/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/02/24/the-untold-truth-about-the-german-hyperinflation/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/06/24/12703/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/12/29/law-of-unintended-consequences/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/the-taxman-cometh/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/10/30/world-trade-turning-negative-same-as-protectionism/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/11/14/the-coming-deflation/
http://armstrongeconomics.com/2013/11/09/deflation-the-great-equalizer-now-greece-was-there-a-different-tested-response-in-history-yes/

My point in the Errata section of the OP about centralized control over debasement isn't that hyperinflation results. I never wrote the word hyperinflation. Rather my point is those who have captured the government gain the fruits of that debasement, or it is wasted by the poor fitness of top-down allocation of resources.

The fourth quarter real estate in Singapore turned down showing that the whole Emerging Markets did tend to peak out with the ECM last August. This has led to a flight of investors from the once-booming emerging markets sector that is similar to the shift in what we began to see in 1994 that manifested into the 1997 Asian Currency Crisis. Previously, international investors poured in some $7 trillion-worth of capital inflows into these emerging markets. This shift in capital outflows for emerging markets has only just begun. The details of the capital flows for 2013 have shown that so far it is retail rather than institutional. The outflows amounted to just over $50 billion. This is also how things started in 1994. Eventually, institutional capital left violently in 1997 to get ready for the birth of the Euro in 1998.

In this case, the leader of the trend has not been institutions, but the retail market investors. It has mainly been this group that has packed their bags and moved back to the USA and European share markets. When the big institutional firms join in, reducing their asset allocation models, then we run the risk of a serious wholesale capital flight as we saw in 1997.

China is starting to slow down and the share markets have established their major high back in 2007 and penetrating the 2013 low in 2014, will warn that China could decline all the way into 2020.

Our models clearly demonstrate that we are looking at a continued economic slide especially among emerging markets that will put greater pressure behind a rising US dollar. The European banks have a total exposure of more than $3 trillion in emerging markets.

The FEMA camps are to arrest civilians when they realize Social Security and the rest of the socialist agenda including pensions are collapsing.

The FEMA camps exist purely because the debt structure is collapsing and those in the bowels of the bureaucracy are scared to death of what they see economically in Europe and the rising civil unrest. There was the incident of 1932 known as the Bonus Army that marched on Washington. That was one of the primary reasons Hoover lost the election because he allowed the troops to move in with tanks against civilians with women and children.