Don't be ridiculous, this is something that anyone could say. I hardly think this is anything to do with it. The first one is without doubt a copy but if that is not financially motivated then since this person who was copy pasting for financially motivated reasons
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=904524 was allowed back then anyone who was not doing it for money should be allowed back for another chance.
I would say wait until snichmoon appears to demonstrate the most damning evidence before building a case.
Thanks for the support but I guess it's still a rule infraction.
That it was a small one isn't going to help me knowing the policy on the forum :p
Unless Mods are in a very good day.
The last example is NOT a rule infraction the first one is a rule infraction but if you were not wearing a sig i don't see it as terminal. If there are lots more then that will likely be no hope.
This person
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=904524 was allowed back with a sig ban so it is your call whether or not to push for the same. They were busted for doing it for financial reasons so there is hope for anyone who did not do it for financial reasons. It is your call whether to push to keep your account or not. If it was a legend account it would 100% be worth it under any circumstances but this is your choice.
I see this
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=904524 as a precedent so if you are were not even wearing a sig at the time it seems your's was NOT as serious.