No, I dont see something very strange in them, because I think that all they can really do is just create planned actions that you can observe today, for example, at ETH. There are already functions that are already standard. Therefore, in general, change can only worsen the situation.
Let me clarify, I'm talking about ERC20 contracts, I have nothing against them, they are a good decision.
I'm just confused about contracts of some ICO which do not indicate soft cap in their code, but they talk about it on their website.
At the moment, I do not understand just that, because this is a guarantee of investor safety
yes for the security of ico investors it wouldn't be wrong. as often as during an ico or ieo recently goals and processes are changed
many would have a problem with that. so i think that's rather ignored. the goals and plans on a website are changed fast
