Post
Topic
Board Meta
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: DefaultTrust changes
by
mikeywith
on 04/04/2019, 22:22:43 UTC
⭐ Merited by EcuaMobi (1)
This is exactly why older more established members should be in charge of the trust system.

I have no comments about what's going on between you and others, as a matter of fact I do trust you a lot, and i do trust some people whom you don't trust and some people that don't trust you and i guess that's normal despite how messed up it looks.

but the quoted statement above is wrong at it's best.

here is a list of 78 confirmed scammers > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3486346.msg36123932#msg36123932

more than 90% of them were never tagged by the "older more established members " but rather by the "new comers" despite the fact that many of them have been scamming the forum long before the new system was implemented.

not saying this because I am a "new comer" DT member but i do not seem to understand why does older has to mean better judgment.

yes i have no clue about the past of this forum, don't know what did TMAN do to who and why does Lauda  not trust you and all that drama, and i honestly don't care , and I don't need to know all that shit to tag scammers.

let alone the simple fact that a few DT members alone can never handle a couple of hundreds if not thousands scammers coming in every week.


 
His trust score went up from 4: -1 / +5 to 707: -0 / +74, which means he's added almost all users who left him positive trust to his trust list.
I'd say this is not how DT1 should be used. Before jumping to conclusions and excluding him, I'm posting it here Smiley

nothing out of the ordinary , just a quick hack  " how to change untrusted feedback to trusted feedback". he forgot to add 4 members who gave him positive feedback tho, maybe because the risked BTC amount was not high enough.

his sent feedback is even worse.

this guy with no doubt does not deserve to be a DT member.