[edited out]
OK, so you keep asserting that BTC has a plan to deal with the negative effects of persistently full blocks. HOWEVER, after repeated requests to reveal what that plan actually consists of, you do nothing but deflect and dissemble.
I call BullShit.
attempting to put some kind of burden on me and others to describe core's plan in a way that is acceptable to you...
Despite your protestations, you have utterly failed -- in any manner whatsoever -- to describe
any core plan for dealing with the negative effects of full blocks. 'Acceptable to me' has nothing the fuck to do with it.
I like bitcoin's conservative approach.
Then you are deluded. BTC's The SegWit Omnibus Changeset was the most radical change ever to be foisted upon Bitcoin, from every discernable dimension. It changed the protocol radically, it changed the supported use cases radically, it changed the economics radically,
Whether those were "radical" changes or NOT, I give two ratt's asses about it.
So what you are really saying above is that you are satisfied with core's decidedly NON-conservative approach. I can take that at face value, but is it any wonder that I reply to your counterfactual statements?