You are the one going off on tangents and ignoring the points that he's making.
And no, lowering the block size would almost certainly kill it right now because people would be incapable of using it and hence likely move elsewhere.
Disagreeing with larger blocks is one thing, although you have failed to produce any sensible argument against it. But advocating for lowering the block size just indicates that you're just running your mouth.
Are you perhaps trying to farm merits so you can join some signature campaign?
nah you got me!.. i am only trying to get merits... but it is for a good reason.
i am trying to enter micgoossens prediction games!.. but he keeps on increasing the merits required!
I am not saying i want to lower the blocksize now, i meant if i had to choose between the two, i would pick lower the blocksize, as i see more benefits from that, than raising the block size.
I told you my thinking behind why larger blocks will not solve the unconfirmed transaction issue with Bitcoin. It is a bandaid fix, that will need to be re-address time and time again!
We need a solution that is outside normal way of thinking, forcing transaction off chain and to layer 2 and yes the only way to do that is too keep the blocksize where it is or smaller and with the benefits that come with that, although most people will see it as a negative....