but something tells me they don't see themselves as some kind of sporting referee who needs to enforce rules based on judgement calls and "send off" offending parties.
yet even before rules even changed. devs have and DID code stuff to send off parties that they disagreed with purely because those parties were not interested in a certain proposal.
that said. without causing a fork war attempt to 'send off' offending parties. the solution is simple. price the spammers that want to multispend out of using bitcoin where other networks and niche services would benefit THEM.
without having the same spammer affecting everyones fee's to cause everyone, even those that dont multispend into the false belief that LN is the saviour for everyone
hint. make the spammers(multispenders) use LN and leave average joe using real bitcoin network cheaply. win win for everyone
P.S definitely keeping this quote for context of other topic doomad flip flops, in regards to your opinion on controversial apartheid causing forks to fake activation thresholds(thank you for digging your own hole deeper)