... insults is all he's got.
I disagree with him on many (most) points but this...just ain't so.
For sure he's a smart guy and makes some good points.
"Smart" isn't in short supply. I grew up in a smart city, was surrounded by smart people, went to a smart university, got a smart degree. I'm just not impressed with "smart." Some people can be extremely intelligent by some measures and especially dumb in others. So what is "smart"?
In my experience, honesty and integrity are far more scarce and far more valuable attributes. I've watched "smart" people destroy the world around them, and themselves, during the course of my lifetime. I'm just not impressed by "smart."
"A hard cap on on-chain txs is a hard cap on on-chain txs, any way you try to spin it." <- then it doesn't matter what size you raise the blocks? how could you advocate larger/bigger blocks when you do not believe in it as a solution to deal with transaction congestion.
WTF are you babbling about? I advocate larger blocks, as I
do believe in it as a solution to deal with transaction congestion. Quite a splendid one, in fact.
Lets keep raising it to the point where the blockchain/database/ledger is so massive, no one is going to want to run a full node.
There will always be those who with to run a full node, if only for the ability to trustlessly process incoming payments.
The other misconception he is pushing is, "higher fees". As much as we all like to pay nothing for something, the true reality is, we need fees to keep bitcoin secure!
The miners don't need your centrally-planned price controls.
You actually remind me of r0ach, when you can not defend your position or answer anything, you just go on a tangent and throw out statements which make no sense..
You still haven't mentioned what size blocks you think Bitcoin needs... reminds me of the little do'er carpet commercial, "tell them the price son!, the price!"