Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [115 Th] 50BTC.com - PPS|Stratum+Vardiff|Port 80|QIWI,Yandex,Mobile,WM...
by
RileyN
on 10/02/2014, 10:29:18 UTC
Okay, Captain Justice here… The only two who didn’t receive at least partial correction are gjpminingco and Mayblaubaer a.k.a. “shady blackmailing club”.
1st one - gjpminingco, can’t even decide what kind of miners he tested. In message from 12.28 he claimed that he tested “3 th/s miners”, in message from 02.06 he claimed - “3 1.3 th/s miners”
Okay, let’s assume he used his latest version - 3 1.3 th/s miners - I think it’s safe to calculate it as 4 th/s.
He claims he started mining 10.15 - difficulty at this moment is 189,281,249 - using http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator we get the 24h result of mining - 10 BTC.
10.16 new difficulty (267,731,249) emerged, 10.18 service was hacked (or whatever did happen) so he mined 2 full days - 10.16 & 10.17 (we are assuming there was not a single d/c or any kind of problem, which is unlikely considering DDoS situation at that moment) - result of mining for 2 days at 267,731,249 diff is 7.5 BTC per day.
So, the final result will be 25 BTC in ideal conditions with nonstop 3 days mining. Kinda not even close to 40 (or something like this) BTC that he claimed he had in a first place.

And to 2nd one - Mayblaubaer I think I already told everything. At first he claimed that he had 70 BTC, then 50BTC proves him wrong and he suddenly agrees with them and claiming that he had 40 BTC.
What is even up with this kind of bullshit ? Am I the only one who sees this ?

Don’t get me wrong guys, I do not approve this kind of action delay from 50BTC either, but at least they’ve started to do something and people ARE receiving so called corrections. (partial or full)