doublec had every right to make a closed-source application for his business.
I don't see anywhere in my post where make the claim he did not have this right. So this appears to me to be a strawman argument.
You can't compare CoinHunter's apparent support of closed-source to that. He took an open-source application, did almost no real work on it, relied on others' significant prior work, released it as open-source, and then changed it because of a personal dispute, taking the opportunity to attack Bitcoin in the "change" and the text file.
I never made any claim to defend what happen, if anything I explicity said I believe the project should remain open source.