Re: 🔥⛏️ [MAINNET] [UPX] uPlexa ⚡️ Anonymity and eCommerce via IoT
Masternodes are essential for achieveing speed and cheap transactions.
However, many coins tend to die out when they enter that phase.
Do you think masternodes are the way to go for uPlexa to become really quick
and almost free to transfer UPX?
Do you know of any other way to achieve it?
Maybe they can implement some kind of "lighting network" transactions, or some kind of "off-chain transaction" like Pivx or clones does? Though it does it through Masternodes, so I guess we're kinda stuck with them here However, many coins tend to die out when they enter that phase.
Do you think masternodes are the way to go for uPlexa to become really quick
and almost free to transfer UPX?
Do you know of any other way to achieve it?
Masternodes the uPlexa way will be different, anyway... Because first of all, everyone will be able to accumulate the collateral by regular PoW mining, and then.. I'm not sure the Masternodes phase will mean extinction of the PoW phase. Maybe both could co-exist? Wouldn't it be the best of both worlds? After all, PoW mining and Masternodes/staking have different purposes in the network.
Question to uPlexa dev: will PoW continue along with Masternodes?
Masternodes will eat some of the PoW reward. So i guess MN will be needed at some point after all.
Another question then:
There was a comparison which shows how uPlexa
has all privacy features that other privacy coins lack.
Since the world went crazy on being "green",
can uPlexa's Cryptonight-upx prove if it is more power efficient than other algos/coins?
If yes by how much?
I'm not from the team, so I won't be able to reply with many technical details, but I can see that the Android miner works fine with 25% (the minimum setting) power, and it doesn't work better on my phone if I use 50 75 or 100% setting. That tends to prove a point concerning the "power efficient" matter
I remember that jce cn cpu miner's dev used to say that uPlexa CN was the most efficient CN variant around, from a CPU point of view. Maybe that was related to power efficiency too?
This would require some thorough testing though... and with different configurations, as one test on one specific computer wouldn't prove anything
uPlexa team?