Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Is Merit Requirement Per Rank Excessive?
by
DireWolfM14
on 12/04/2019, 16:15:01 UTC
I am currently the 95th most merited person on the forum and in the just under 16 months since the merit system was introduced, I have not yet received sufficient merit required to become a hero member. I was around when a lot of sMerit was airdropped to everyone and a lot of merit was being given out by a lot of people. There are more merit sources now, but much fewer people are now giving out merit.

The above means less than 95 people have become hero members, I know only a small handful of people have become legendary. I don’t know off hand how many have become senior members but I am pretty sure it isn’t many.

Based on the above, I think the merit system needs to be tinkered with a little bit.

I don't see that as a big deal.  After 16 months, and you're almost a self-made Hero Member.  That seems like a reasonable time frame. 

I had zero experience with cryptocurrency when I joined the forum a year ago, and that last time I did any coding was over 25 years ago.  I try to be helpful, courteous (mostly,) and share what I learn, and despite my lack of technical knowledge I was able to attain Sr. Member status in about 11 months. 

I don't know what a reasonable time frame for ranking up is, but it's bound to take some of us longer than others.  Some of the members that rank up quickly are spending many hours a day on the forum, and making hundreds of posts a week.