said that most of Sig campaign rules are just similar.
Rules in signature campaigns are nearly the same, in my opinion. There are so little difference in campaigns' rules, and mostly concentrate on payment rates, check days, total required minimum posts or maximum accepted posts to get paid, as well as acceptable boards to have countable posts. It looks good for TrustDice, so far, that they don't got accusation on plagiarism, or something like this. I don't have to much skills to find out such issues, but let's see the growth of TrustDice, and findings from community next few weeks.
there are differences in signature campaign , the rules depend on the manager and the site owner who ordered it
I don't see anyone accusing Trustdice of plagiarism though
I don't see them run a signature campaign just yet , correct me if I'm wrong
signature campaigns at Bitcointalk are a sort of some quality assurance mark for a casino
if they can afford 1 bitcoin+ to advertise , they should be focused on long term and not exit scam or something like that
.
I think it's also not too bad to test and run Signature campaign for a short time to see some results.
I personally agree that Signature campaign needs to be run for a quite long time.