The burden of proof is definitely on you to prove that the meaning of the book is not what the author said the meaning of the book was...
Author never said book was about communism. He said it was about Stalinism...
Go ahead, prove it if you can. Quote him. But stop making things up.
Don't bother. This is more comtard logic from mOgLie. BuT iTs Not TrUe COmMuNiSm!
I'd be willing to listen to a more detailed analysis, supported by facts, which should be plentiful since we're talking Orwell here. But that not forthcoming, I have to agree with you that this is the "True Scotsman" logical fallacy.
(side note. of course I've already researched and read on this, and already know the chess game a couple moves ahead....)