Curious is that the delisting does not seem to square with Binance's stated criteria. Of course, CZ is free to do what he wishes with the exchange he owns. But is seems more virtue signaling than adherence to rational criteria.
When we conduct these reviews, we consider a variety of factors. Here are some that drive whether we decide to delist a digital asset:
Commitment of team to project
Level and quality of development activity
Network / smart contract stability
Level of public communication
Responsiveness to our periodic due diligence requests
Evidence of unethical / fraudulent conduct
Contribution to a healthy and sustainable crypto ecosystem
I would guess our opinions on this might differ but I would say it meets the bolded quite well. They are calling for the doxing of an individual on the net. No matter how wrong he may or may not have been to call names, that is an egregious move.= and significantly unprofessional *and* unethical. And that is just one example. There is a whole website dedicated to various fraud from one of the leaders.