Ok, we only had an hour or two in the lab and the customer wanted to point the machines at their pool after we did our initial tests. We were in such a rush across beijing in traffic to get to the lab that I totally forgot about alerting you.
We were also surprised by getting 38TH as we predicted 37 based on the voltage setting of the PSU. There is even more headroom in frequency, ( say at least 33%) but we may hit cooling limits and we hit the limits of the power strip when we pushed it beyond 2500.
I need to do some more structured tests and longer times at temperature, Needs some prep time and we will give you a heads up when we head to the lab again.
We were also surprised by getting 38TH as we predicted 37 based on the voltage setting of the PSU. There is even more headroom in frequency, ( say at least 33%) but we may hit cooling limits and we hit the limits of the power strip when we pushed it beyond 2500.
I need to do some more structured tests and longer times at temperature, Needs some prep time and we will give you a heads up when we head to the lab again.
I can probably find them (in the logs) via the diff they were mining at and hopefully a full hour ... will reply once I've done that.
Edit: didn't find any single a10's with 30-40k work diff - so I guess they were chained miners?
Next time just tell me the time (+timezone) you ran them and how you chained them (1, 2, 3 etc) and I should be able to find the stats
(the share logs are eternal)
If you give one a different worker name than the default (e.g. canaan.38) then I'll be able to find it even easier
