I am sorry, but this is an unfair post.  Listen, many of us have also been burnt here.  It's never nice losing money.  In fact, I fucking hate it, but we don't need people that are no longer involved in this project FUDing … Move on!

Many of us are still involved and quietly optimistic.  Of course I would change many things that Bankera do, because I personally do not agree with the way the business is run, but I am prepared to give them the chance they asked for when they said it was a 'long term project'.  You should only really pass judgment until they have a business operating with several products as they promised.  You are just not helping those that are long term backers … Unless that is your objective?

I do, however, want to address some of your accusations though:

Firstly, Bankera's founders bought the bank privately, not Bankera.  This was a purchase made outside of the business, so the benefit lies with them and not token holders.  Whilst I expect them to integrate the bank at some point in the future, this is nothing to do with their business.  Whether it is "scam bank … illegal in EU, US, China and can be used only by residents of third world countries" as you say, it is totally irrelevant to us.  They could be turning into nightclub for all we know … It is just immaterial!

Secondly, the ICO article you are referring to was public domain news that is more than a year old.  Please give the Central Bank of Lithuania some credit.  Bankera would have been suspended or brought to justice if there was any wrongdoing.  This is one of the largest ICOs ever conducted and was always going to draw attention, so why would you operate illegally in this day and age (post financial crisis) knowing that.  Makes zero sense!

Anyway, I just thought I would give my opinion here!