Going to zero twice, and thinking you have the winning strategy sounds like what someone with a gambling issue would say.
You want someone else's money to bail you out if you go to zero again, but what happens if that pool of funds is spent?
The next group of investors would be required, which sounds exactly like a ponzi scheme to me.
You want someone else's money to bail you out if you go to zero again, but what happens if that pool of funds is spent?
The next group of investors would be required, which sounds exactly like a ponzi scheme to me.
I was only 1 time to zero.
I think the translator boycotted me
An insurance system has already been idealized,
in case of loss, there will be some steps to be taken so that traders can exit with winning positions even in the event of market collapse.
you didn't answer my question at all...