his 2nd 'bigger' bet is so lucky. and then risking everything you earned on the next risky bet doesnt look a thing most people would do. is there a way server seed could have been compromised. is this really 100% for sure just luck?
I've verified the bets, and I can confirm he did indeed win that. Which means either:
a) Daniel and I have
both been compromised [1]
b) He was lucky
[1] By "compromised" I mean either "acting dishonestly" or "have been hacked". If I hacked Daniel for instance, that would count as both compromised. (me for being dishonest, Daniel for losing his server seed). But if only 1 of us were compromised, the other one should be seeing the games aren't verifying.
I hate to be over-confident (I always feel like I'm jinxing reality), but I'd say there's probably a >99.999% chance that the win is legitimate.
690 bets of sizes below 100k satoshi...then, suddenly he 2500x's his tiny amount catapulting to over 9BTC, then plays THE ENTIRE 9.784BTC in winnings in
THE VERY NEXT BET for a total of 47~ BTC profit
He then loses 12BTC following spin and stops after this.
Do you understand how unlikely this is, in reality?
And of course...as BAC said, there is no way to prove if this was an inside job or not, everyone just has to trust your words that it wasn't you.