He will be removed from the Yobit signature campaign, that's all.
Having a negative trust doesn't mean you don't have the right to participate in discussions.
You have a negative trust but still you are one of the most active users.
Perfectly stated. Plus I don't buy the hard luck story, as I strongly suspect this guy is a seasoned veteran of signature campaigns. In any case, neither his account nor his life is ruined by having negative trust.
That was 2016 when there accounts were first starting to get tagged. It didn't, and there's no explanation for this that you'd be satisfied with--and I'm not interested in feeding trolls. Nobody is going to tag him for that now anyway. Please fuck off.
Please do not use that language towards me. Remain civil.
We are discussing trust. If you recognize in 2014 that selling your account leaves members vulnerable to scamming then decide to sell your account then by your own argument you are untrustworthy. Nutildah deserves red trust far more than this person.
I will see to it that he is tagged or that every other persons tag is removed for buying and selling accounts.
He argued that selling your account makes you untrustworthy before he went right ahead and decided to sell his own account. If he strongly believed selling accounts leaves members open to scamming and went ahead and contributed to the probability of people being scammed.
We know that you will often protect know scammers and are untrustworthy sneaky and greedy yourself Huge Black Woman. You used that alt to troll racist sig spam for btc crumbs.
@ Steamtyme
I hope you will be red flagging the nutildah account or I will call you on double standards here. Read my above post for details.