So there's this campaign that I've participated that locked bounty rewards in the hopes of avoiding token dumping. As what I expected, the dumping still happened. What's even funnier is that it is now the bounty hunters who complains unlike before where investors blame bounty hunters 
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
If there's any coins or tokens that should be locked, it should only be the team's share (or maybe add those given to advisors). Both parties (investors & hunters) have invested either money or time to get their share and they should not be subjected to such restriction.
Instead of locking, teams should just concentrate on other methods such as buy back and loyalty rewards to lessen the chances of price crash.
Those campaign who are locking bounty rewards the management of the team project are not thinking properly. Bounty hunters did their part to support the project and yet in the end it is not right that they took the blame of dumping their tokens to the bounty hunters were was very unjust. Even before to some other campaign without locking the bounty rewards dumping its price value still continued happen in the market. Meaning, locking bounty rewards is still useless at all and its not helping too.