I have to agree that JollyGood looks like he is pursuing a smear campaign against you and your business. It was in part because of this that when I started writing my first post in this thread, it was defending you, however once I worked through the details my opinion changed against you.
There was no agenda for a smear campaign against betking or against scammer Dean Nolan.
Noted.
My suggestion is that you stop posting in these threads about betking. If you will not do that I would stop referring to its owner as "scammer Dean Nolan".
My personal opinion is that betking appears to be owned by a scammer, and if its owner is named "Dean Nolan" my opinion is it would not be inaccurate to refer to him this way.
The way you post in this thread gives me sympathy to betking, that only goes away after a close examination of the evidence and facts surrounding his ICO/debt tokens. I don't know that other people will be willing to take the time to review the evidence as closely as I did.
Just my two cents, you can take it or leave it.