This works until it doesn't. And then not so funny things happen:
See? The judge apparently is so ignorant as me. Or is this e-signing not so sure as you might think.
With Obyte wallet where the password is not mandatory it's just laughable.
If you read the article carefully you will find that in EU for e-signature to be valid and not dismissed by court:
"users must be positively identified and certified as being the individual they claim to be before they can issue an e-signature above the simple electronic signature level."
There's no certification process of validity in Obyte so claiming that:
"even Obyte announcement says that prosaic contracts satisfy all 4 requirements of advanced electronic signature under Article 26 of eIDAS in EU"
is equally laughable.