I voted for Yahoo.
The major reason why I love his campaigns is because of the high success rate. I've seen some of the campaigns he managed that yielded good profit for the participants. He doesn't just accept a deal anyhow like other BMs which I won't mention their names.
I will vote twice for him if possible.
Yahooo is also my favorite but newbies won't ever see how his legacy works at this moment. Things got ugly and the fomo has left us for more than a year that resulted into very less bounty campaigns that yahoo could've handled professionally. And now all the good to best managers are willing to get tagged negative just to get paid but not him.
I dislike bounty campaigns, that's part of the reason I only take on a few a year. There are so many cheaters joining them, teams are not willing to pay good money to a BM, and the headache just isn't worth it in the long run.
If I do take on a client I feel I only accept the best of the best. So far most campaigns managed by me in the form of a bounty campaign have been successful for all participants.
Yes, most of the bounties managed Yahoo has been successful, of course, it will take time for the manager to choose the right one to manage. Still, there are many people who will a lot of interest in Yahoo's management once he launches the bounty campaign.