Its not clear what are you even trying to do here.
You even edited your own quote to show bitcloak name instead of bestmixer, pretty rude thing
I did that to put things on context. Both work the same way, so they have the same conceptual vulnerability. Why do you think I even put a strikethrough on BestMixers name? FacePalm.
since this sentence is incorrect "works exactly as the other traditional mixers".
Coins on Address A;
Send coins to mixer -> Receive coins on Address B.
Both work exactly this way (like every other traditional mixer).
here is trying to discredit the competition (since you are paid by chipmixer).
I'm not trying to discredit anyone. I'm not biased on my opinions (I was even defending BitBlender yesterday from a guy claiming that he was scammed - wtf). Stop with the ad hominem. You are trying to discredit my opinions and posts based on my signature, while all I'm saying is 100% TRUE. Attack my arguments and not my signature. FFS.