Seems okay I guess (although this is a step back towards centralization), and it looks like I don't have to modify any existing ratings.
Really? can you present your strong case that I am a scammer because I can present observable instances where you have
1. Lied for financial gain (scammed)
2. Trust abused the system, and given red trust to individuals for them merely stating they will encourage others to examine your post history
3. Been STRONGLY implicated in an extortion scheme
We will welcome a full debate with such an observable liar, scammer, trust abuser and one STRONGLY implicated in a serious extortion scheme. Not to mention the escrow details on that 3000 btc move you pulled, not that we are saying that has as yet a strong case behind it but we feel it should have a transparent full investigation done on it.
What's wrong guys?? you don't wish to see scammers ONLY given scam tags?A step back to centralization hahah. What lauda means is that red trust is being gradually taken away from him to silence whistle blowers that present observable instances of his lying and scamming.
Time to ensure ONLY scammers get scam tags, not just anyone who mentions observable instances in your own past you would like to hide.