as for your over meanders about bigblocks and altcoins.. my stand is about scaling BITCOIN. not deburdening BITCOIN and scaling alternative networks
Please name the Bitcoin users who give the slightest shit about your stand. You keep thinking that everyone agrees with you, so surely you'd have some idea of who some of those people might be, right?
For all your talk of doing what is best for Bitcoin, you do nothing but attack the path that users on the Bitcoin network have empirically chosen to follow. I'd tell you to find some people who agree with your stand and form a network with them if you don't like how the people on this network have decided to go about scaling, but it's pretty obvious that anyone who might agree with you has already forked off to one of the altcoins you don't want us discussing. If people are drawing comparisons between your stand and those altcoins, the reason for that is that your stand is not compatible with the rules other users on this network have chosen to enforce. Your stand is empty, hollow, insubstantial and ineffective. Your stand is not recognised or acknowledged by the Bitcoin network. If you want a network that isn't "deburdened", there are other networks catering to your desires.
typical mindset. you say 'find people that agree', which is your subtle a foolish mindset flip flop thinking that no one disagree's with cores roadmap. sorry but this very forum shows hundreds of people disliking the fee wars, transaction throughput limit and that cores roadmap is trying to deburden bitcoin while falsely advertising it as 'scaling bitcoin'.
your mindset is also foolishly thinking that if people dont want to deburden bitcoin, those people should leave the network and make another network.
it seems all you think as a solution for the bitcoin network is for people to stop using the bitcoin network.. (facepalm)
as for saying those that have opposed cores roadmap have forked off.. im sorry to inform you that core forked some opposition off the network by controversial splits. but them people do run a core node even if they dont like it.
just because cores software is the only on that satisfies all the requiremnts of bing a full validation/full archival criteria, does not mean those using it are core loyalists. it just means they dont want the drama of REKT campaigns and mor mandatory splits, so just give in
your belief that running a core node means adoration and loyalty is your flaw. and may you wake up and realise your foolishness one day.
blockchains and bitcoins are about progress through unity and agreement.(consensus).
if you think that all disagreements should result in totalitarian control and apartheid law. then please do yourself a favour and learn the invention satoshi made. learn the meaning definition of consensus, then learn about the byzantine generals theory and how that was solved. hint. a method of mutual agreement, not division and factions