In fact, the current problem is that the IFC network does not have enough computing power to protect it, and there will be no big computing power for protection in a short period of time. Therefore, it is difficult to improve security through computing power.
In fact, in general, all circulating Coins will generally be converted to POS for the protection blockchain to continue to operate.
However, the IFC community has always believed that the POS approach is not conducive to the popularization of unlimited currency, and finally the people with more coins have the final say. It is also not conducive to the circulation of coins.
The internal discussion plan that was leaked before was also designed based on the above points. Keeping the block data unchanged, adding restrictions on the basis of the POW mechanism, this program is called POW2.0 by people involved in the internal discussion (this program is my own thinking, and is not open to the public, if you are interested in participating in the discussion, you can Send me an email ifc@1e9.cc).
While the world is promoting environmental protection and energy conservation, it may be more energy-efficient (POW2.0) will be more popular, and may make IFC a unique feature in the world of so many coins, or a pioneering work.
This article does not attempt to convince anyone, nor does it comment on any existing consensus mechanisms. Just tell everyone not to look at the problem from a one-sided perspective.

---
其实目前的问题在于，IFC网络没有足够的算力保护，且短时间内不会有大算力进行保护。所以安全性很难通过算力提升。
其实一般来说，全部流通的Coin，一般都会转为POS进行保护区块链继续运行。
但是IFC社区一直认为POS的方式不利于普及无限币，最后还是由币多的人说了算。也不利于币的流通。
对于此前泄露的内部讨论方案，也是基于以上观点进行设计的。保持区块数据不变，在POW机制基础上增加限制，此方案被参与内部讨论的人称为了POW2.0（此方案是我自己的思考，并且没有对外公开，如果有兴趣一起参与讨论的，可以给我发邮件ifc@1e9.cc）。
在全世界都在提倡环保节能的时候，可能更节能的（POW2.0）会更受欢迎，也可能会让IFC在如此多的币的世界中一点与众不同的特点，或是一个创举。
这个文章没有试图说服谁，也不评论现有任何的共识机制。仅仅告诉大家不要站在片面的角度看待问题。