Telegram History in "INV Analytica Community [@invacioofficial]---------------------------------- start
.....25.05.2018 22:00:01, R1 R1 [@R1R1B]: >>upgraded the group to a supergroup<<
.....25.05.2018 22:24:48, Hopsplat [@Hopsplat]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:24:52, Colin Ferrell [@ColinFerrell]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:07, James Beal [@Mrbates1]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:13, Youcanbecome: >>joined the group<<
25.05.2018 22:25:39, Corey Wilton - Help Desk [@CoreyWilton]: 🚀 Please dont kick and punch, just discuss and have fun. Remember we are all on the same team.
We are now trading on the following exchanges: 💰
www.idex.market
www.mercatox.com
www.bancor.network
.....25.05.2018 22:25:43, Corey Wilton - Help Desk [@CoreyWilton]: >>unsupported service message type: messageActionPinMessage<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:47, Kim [@kbyber]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:26:53, Tonyladz [@Tonyladz1]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:26:59, Nash Geo [@NashGeo]: >>joined the group<<
25.05.2018 22:27:11, Nash Geo [@NashGeo]: INV 1 CENT CONFIRMED
:
:
:
24.04.2019 20:44:02, Laurel & Hardy [@LH03330323402r049r94]: As to the remark about this "being my community" and the tone taken.
This tone was taken as we have already been attacked in the past as a result of poorly worded / understood announcments.
Saying we "had confirmation for Binance/Bittrex would be a complete missrepresentation, for one we made it abundantly clear during that period we had 0 intention of listing on Binance due to privacy constraints this was only resolved when we moved ops for Invmail from outside the EU zone, as such we applied and we are waiting, we've never stated we had been accepted (in public) though have had discussions with Binance related people, also scammers pretending to be Binance people which has only ever been discussed in private groups.
The same for Bittrex, we've never said we'd agreed listing, in fact i do not believe we even stated we'd applied, though i could be wrong on the second part (applied).
I say "we" in the past tense as this brings me on to the next part.
I have made it abundantly clear i am no longer actively involved with Invacio and its day to day operations, truth be told, i have visited its site(s) 3 times in this month, 6 times last month.
I am the Founder (Group) though again non-active, and reluctantly the person who appears to be the face due to the depths i am in debt with the project whilst all others have dissappeared with their riches or onto pastures green.
I stepped away, and made it abundantly clear that 'i' refuse to allocate any more intellectual ideas to Invacio Group, or any of its subsidaries.
You have been given technologies as promised, there will not be anymore from me, these were delivered, you have two more technology offerings coming in Veritas and API, that is it from me, more importantly my commitments have been honoured, and Invacio Group honours its contractual agreements to Invacio AAP Holdings for technology provisions, even if the unlikely event the company is sold or broken apart for its IP, these contractual commitments to Invacio AAP Holdings will be honoured and will continue to serve those products as outlined and committed to.
As to the future of the INV project, i will speak frankly, if INV can not gain grassroots movement from its token-holders then it will never survive, you have more products than any other project out there hitting multiple market segments, you also have one of the lowest cap tokens in the market for such an array of offerings and yet there is just a few active people talking about the project.
As to my position - I hang around here as i am still accumulating INV, I believe it has a place and stand from the side(s) supporting it, i also do own 2xxk INV from my team tokens, which i'd burn if i would see any benefit, but i also believe i earned those tokens, and its the little i have recieved for all my commitments that have been honoured.
Invacio AAP Holdings? - What next, Invacio AAP Holdings has a contractual agreement to provide utility and products from Invacio's technologies, it has done this, and these remain active, and will continue to do so with the last two products releasing shortly.
Marketing as mentioned many times, Invacio AAP Holdings committed to 14% of realised, it records show it spent well over 1m USD in crypto during the coinsale which amounts to more than four times the unrealised crypto funds that are currently sat tethered, if those funds rise on the markets then i am sure that is to be re-addressed but it won't be anytime soon.
I truly hope (for my sake financially and others) that INV is able to rise, and that people talk about the merrits of the project, but i am not leading that charge but encouraging it, i am not running Invacio AAP Holdings, it has governing rules to follow and has followed it, delivering on its promises.
---------------------------------- end
Note: Laurel & Hardy [@LH03330323402r049r94] is yet another Telegram account of William James Dalrymple West (ex-CEO of Invacio)