I know Armstrong did call some of the lows and highs you posted with a fair bit of accuracy, but he mentioned some highs and lows that did not happen. It is understandable if the arrays are admitted not to be 100% but it is not possible to take credit for when they picked a high or low then disclaim the same methodology when it had a false positive. The same methodology must be used, but any exceptions to this methodology(ies) must be stated beforehand (eg, what will constitute a WRONG trade).

So I suggest the following to put this matter at rest once and for all. Anyone using the Private Blog or Socrates Pro, please post trades in real time. I've posted a bunch of trades live as well as forecasts. If a human who is much worse at trading than Socrates AI which is purported to be far superior, then Socrates should at least be able to give basic buy/sells at least on the level of a normal human being. We know the arrays are not 100%, so let's avoid them and use only Reversal Elections on the Weekly+ timeframe. If you want to use arrays, okay, but post entries. Hypothetical situations that end up not panning out the way a forecast predicted for whatever reason will automatically count as a losing trade. Entry and exits are objective as can be with Reversal elections. If it doesn't happen even with so many Socrates users on board, it probably means that there is no CONFIDENCE. In trading, CONFIDENCE is important, as Armstrong points out.