The claim then, is that Vod never indicated that there was 500 BTC connected to the address or it's resident?
I will happily edit my feedback, retract my statement, apologize and go on a public tour if I am incorrect.
I do not want to be a liar, but you're not being very clear.



My priority is that everyone is held to the same standard. You do something wrong, you face consequence. There is no disagreement that what was done was wrong; what are the appropriate consequences? Everybody seems to agree consequences are appropriate, but whenever any are enforced there is more backlash against the consequences than there ever was against Vod or the DOXing.

Worded the way you have asked the question, BitcoinTalk > OGNasty, every single time. I have no loyalty to that man, I don't know him, I just see something that we all agree is wrong, DOXING, and it warrants negative trust - in my opinion, at least temporarily.

So, to keep it concise you are incorrect in how you are viewing my role in all of this. This is, however, why I avoid Reputation like it is the plague, because it is the plague of our community.

Switch the roles, if OG released Vod's DOX, OG would have a negative feedback from me.
What's funny about that though, I'd probably still be on DT1.

I'm not here to play favorites, but some people are experiencing cognitive dissonance to a degree that can only be found in people that have suffered severe lack of socializing.


I can't believe you think this sentence was worth writing.