Define "relatively private".
Not accesible by public means, e.g. only certain people (say collectors) have it. This is not the case with Og, never was.
The way you're wording this makes it sound like Vod mentioning there being 500 BTC involved was irrelevant to the magnitude of malicious intent being expressed.
I frankly couldn't care less whether he mentioned it or not. If someone had any intentions with those details prior to knowing about the funds, Vod maybe saved them a couple minutes of reading.
Let's keep it simple, do you believe it's reasonable to think there is someone that has OG's information, or a new piece of OG's information that they didn't have prior to the DOX release?
Let's assume you're going to be honest and say "yes, of course someone downloaded his information that was too clueless to otherwise find it."
Do you think anybody that saved his information from that post has good intentions?
Yes. No, and it doesn't matter. People with real bad intentions didn't need Vod's post, and even with the post they're would want to validate the information (the methodology would be very similar to if they were searching for it to begin with).
The biggest claim against me is "exaggeration", so let's boil it down to the most reductionist level we can. How should this event be viewed?
Rewrite or remove the rating would be a starter. Moronbozo laid out the issue nicely, and don't even get me started on rmc. He's the Chumlee of this forum. If I were to call you an inconsistent hypocrite, he would be the inventor of hypocrisy. Note: I didn't even start.