As mentioned previously, this is only to prove or disprove Armstrong's system publicly, not to take trades based on it. A lot of people have lost money on his calls. On that subject, ones who espouse his calls, let me ask you this: What about the wrong in calling for a November low in gold? What about the February market high of the so called 25100 number? Why do Armstrong fans not talk about those LOSING calls? It's just doing the same thing, smoke and mirrors while ignoring the losing calls.

You're talking about indicators which have nothing to do with proving Armstrong one way or a other, indicators don't do anything.

November low in gold was wrong
February market high was wrong
August Panic Cycle and turning point against Bullish was wrong
So much wrong

Can any Armstrong fan clearly state them? Or are some Armstrong multis running around? StrikeEagle is almost certainly Martin Armstrong, as I previously showed, with evidence and you can check my posts to match when his blog posts came out.

Why does Armstrong state you can trade against Reversals when time is running out and claim he got it right, but when he is wrong he says never anticipate? You can't have it both ways. Oh, and dont forget alignment and cycle inversions- extra options to avoid accountability for wrong calls. But guess what? Once you enter a trade, it comes down to a yes or a no. Socrates saying it wasnt wrong because of an obscure number or cycle will not change the fact that once a trade is entered, it will have an outcome. What methodology is anyone even using consistently to generate profits? Or are you changing it each time? Can any Armstrong fan answer these incredibly basic questions?