You remind me a lot about the French author Houellebecq with his depressing view on life and his complete failure to connect with the other sex.
Stop trolling, Cryptobimbo. Everyone knows women are not capable of surviving on their own under law of the jungle. Their entire evolutionary strategy revolves around attempting to manipulate men to protect them and provide them with resources. Everything about you from the way you think, the way you talk, the way you fake cry when you get caught doing something wrong to try and get out of it, is evolutionarily designed solely to try and trick, deceive, or exploit men, because without the man you just flat out die in most time periods of history.
Absolutely nothing pisses a woman off more than a man that knows exactly how their brain operates since it then becomes impossible for their manipulation and deception to work, then they have millions of years of evolutionary strategy down the drain. Women are solipsistic creatures incapable of self introspection and would never admit it on their own, but when called out and described in detail, they say "oh shit, that is how women are designed. Dammit, the goyim know. I need to pretend it's not true". So just like a woodpecker has no reason to exist without a tree to peck on, you have no reason to exist without constantly attempting to manipulate or exploit some random dumbass man.
This is why women, no matter if they're 10 or 90, are always obssessed with things like romance novels and movies. You're a mindless biological robot who is attempting to channel their programming to seek out and manipulate or exploit men and just rebranding it into the all encompassing term "romance". You whine about my post because it's the truth, and the truth is very inconvenient for you.
One of your big thinking flaws comes from the fact that you generalize group properties and attribute them to each individual of a group like its a certainty.
All you've done is identify an inherent weakness in your own thinking and a strength of mine. Females only care about things like interpersonal relationships and they're completely incapable of macro-view of populations. This is why you have all these braindead women in Europe welcoming in invaders. Even if you scientifically proved to them that 80% of the invaders would gladly murder them with an axe, they would say, well, it's only fair we let them in anyway because the other 20% are perfectly wonderful people.
Stereotypes and generalizations exist for a reason. It's an inherent survival strategy. Maybe cats don't like water because over millions of years, something would eat them when they got near a lake. Claiming generalizations are bad is completely idiotic. Stereotypes would also not even be offensive if they weren't based on the truth.
Women as a whole are not good thinkers or philosophers or anything like that because everything about your judgement is clouded by out of control hormones, motherly instinct, and all the other things that generally make women as a whole bi-polar-esque, overly emotional, irrational, and unstable. Find something else to compete in because you're not logical enough to compete with me in any type of thinking activity.
Although Im a bitcoin bull and I am somewhat entertained by your posts centred towards PMs. I whole heartedly agree with your outtake on women and it is pretty much spot on. Most who disagree have been feminised by a society who keeps pushing the agenda that men and women are equal.
Crypto queen offers nothing of value here except shots of her fake French manicures, fake boobs in front of food? This is a gross representation of women today, desperate for attention and will seek it anywhere they can get it.
I like you microgoosens, Your twitter links give temporary relief to those of us holding in down trends. This woman of yours is no saint, think how many men have been through her before you and how hard theyve been through her. Women like that cant love for life, as with each guy they sleep with a piece of them breaks off and they become bitter, insecure and untrustworthy.
Something to think about moving forward.
As for roach, I know you think btc is set to implode and one player is manipulating the market in his favour. If true, how long do you think this can continue on?